Beware this is going to be long; only venture in if you are prepared to read for a while and engage in some tough thinking…
Have you ever wondered why our Bible is not written like a systematic theology book? How come, when we use the Romans road, we “travel all over Romans” to tell the gospel story? Why is Christ never recorded as using a “method” to share the truth of His coming? In fact His gospel presentation was always specifically tailored to the person he was witnessing to…The rich young ruler was told to sell all his possession and give them to the poor, and than follow Christ. Nicodemus was told he “must be born again” (which btw was not a cliché Netcasters answer—he was connecting with Nicodemus on a pharisaical tradition). The Women at the Well was asked if she wanted something that offered lasting satisfaction (satisfaction being an obvious problem in her life because she had 5 different husbands). The woman with the issue of blood was told to “believe”. When Christ seemingly shut the door on the Gentile Women’s plea for help, she responded with a plea for Christ to “throw her scraps as he would a dog,” he responded with a statement that he had not seen such great faith in all of Israel and as a result she was guaranteed eternal life…
It seems that sharing the gospel is not best suited to repetitious outlines and repeat-after-me-prayers, and yet that is how it is presented.
I wonder if we have become so stuck on getting out the problem of sin, the penalty for sin, and the plan for redemption that we failed to “tell the story as it really happened”.
What would it be like for us to begin our salvation story at creation instead of the fall? To tell people how God created a perfect world and how people lived in that perfect world. To point out that their own earning for honesty and fairness is simple proof that God created a perfect world. Obviously the fall destroyed this perfect world, but that salvation can reconcile a broken relationship between God and man, and we can still return to living life the way God intended it to be lived.
It seems that in our zealousness to “get people into heaven” and “out of Hell” that we have tons of premature salvation decisions (c’mon, how come 90% of all people who make the decision at 4 or 5 end up having to “get assurance” or realize that it is a “heart decision and not a head decision,” or the just had to make sure “because they had doubts”). When someone was saved in the bible there was an obvious commitment to a way of life that accompanied their decision. This “way” was living as Christ lived—taking care of the poor, helping the marginalized and oppressed, teaching meekness, forgiveness and humility, braking down religious preconceptions and error. People who chose to “follow Christ” realized they were taking on a commitment to live this way. Now, we’re just worried about saving people from hell that we think the whole live like Christ did happens “when we surrender everything” in a post salvation decision. So what would it be like if when someone made the decision to “be saved” they realized that salvation was kind of like a wedding and that Christianity was like marriage—it’s a commitment. It’s not easy. It takes lots of work. There are tons of frustrations and setbacks. There are times when it seems like it would be easier to chuck the whole thing, but we’ve committed to Christ and so we’re not willing to throw in the towel. Sure marriage is a beautiful thing, but it’s all of these other things as well. Salvation seem to follow the same lines…perhaps were salvation told this way, we wouldn’t feel like so many of our churches are dead, and we wouldn’t have lost so many of our own young people.
I came across this the other day and I think it puts what I’m trying to say in understandable terms…
“Yesterday, I went to the store and I bought four new tires.”…end of story.
It is a short story, I know, but I need you to do something to make reading the rest of this worth while. Choose one word that captures the meaning and the essence of that story.
One word.
Have you chosen yet? If you need to stop and read the story again, go ahead. Take your time.
OK time is up. If you understood what I meant by my instructions, I’m guessing you probably chose some word similar to “shopping” or “purchase” or “transaction.” If you really got in to that story you might have chosen some word like “torque bearing load extension” which is more than word and doesn’t exist. If you wandered off in the middle of that story, you might want to seek some professional help about your attention deficiency. You may be alerted to your need if your word choice has more to do with the squirrel outside your open window than it does with a story that was told in twelve words. Your lack of focus might also be tipped off if you have just found yourself counting the words in the story.
Now that we are on the same page, I am going to be making some presumptions about the words you might choose as I retell this same story several times. Take time to think of a new word at the end of each telling.
Here is the same story with an additional detail included.
“Yesterday, I went to the store and I bought four new tires for my next-door neighbor.”…end of story.
Your word is…?
I’m guessing your word has changed as the story takes on a new dimension. A word like “generosity” or “charity” might be your choice.
Let’s do it again.
“Yesterday, I went to the store and I bought four new tires for my next-door neighbor with money that he gave me.”…end of story.
Again, choose a word.
I’m guessing I’ve been knocked down a notch or two as the story is now about “errand” or “favor” instead of our previous choices. To keep the squirrel watchers engaged, I need to quickly tell the story again.
“Yesterday, I went to the store and I finally bought four new tires for my next-door neighbor with money that he gave me three years ago.”…end of story.
And this story can be summed up with what word?
It seems like the essence of this story talks about “procrastination” or maybe “delinquency” might come to mind.
Again.
“Yesterday, I went to the store and I finally bought four new tires for my next-door neighbor with money that he gave me three years ago. It was birthday money that he intended for me to buy new tires for my truck.”…end of story.
You might pause to think this time. Choose a word before I force one on you.
My mind goes to the fine art of “regifting” or maybe you would go back up to the words “generous” and “charity.”
We have gone through big shifts in our thinking to categorize this story from “delinquency” to “generosity” simply by shedding additional light on the details and depth of the story.
One last time.
“Yesterday, I went to the store and I finally bought four new tires for my next-door neighbor with money that he gave me three years ago. It was birthday money that he intended for me to buy new tires for my truck.
As I pulled out of my driveway to go purchase the tires, his dog, my neighbor’s only real family, darted out from between our fences, and I ran over it. I decided that I was going to do what it takes to pay for this dog’s medical care. I went into debt with medical bills for the dog, but six days later, it died.
My neighbor didn’t talk to me for six months.
Despite my financial debts, that cash for new tires sat untouched on my dresser.
Though it’s been three years It’s still ####### him. Most of my gestures of kindness are not accepted, as he wouldn’t want me to think of it as somehow representing forgiveness. But yesterday, after years of heartfelt attempts, I noticed another need. His tires were balding.
‘You know,’ I said softly, ‘I never got around to spending that cash you gave me for what you intended. I wonder if you wouldn’t let me buy you some new tires?’
He paused, got real quiet, then finally said, ‘OK…yes.’”…end of story.
You probably chose your word before the story was even over. Hopefully you chose a word like “restoration” or “reconciliation” because now that you’ve heard all these details, you recognize that is what this story is about.
How about this Story, “You are a sinner. Jesus died for your sins. Believe on Him and when you die you will go to Heaven.”
If that is how we tell the Story, we might lead people to believe that the story is about “transaction” or “generosity.” But that’s not what this Story is really about.
This version of the Story would lead you to think that it is about Justification, but it is not. The Gospel Story, the Story of the Bible, the Story of human history is a Story of reconciliation.
I would contend that we are addicted to and gorged on the Justification version, and it leaves us starved for the nutrition that would come from Reconciliation. We tell the Story as if it starts with the Fall instead of where it does begin, at Creation.
I have spent my life in church traditions that typically tell the Story in the same manner an ad executive might sell a car. Create an internal crisis that establishes a need. Once that need is acknowledged, present the product we are selling as the best fit to meet that need… There are a few problems in presenting salvation in the same method of commercialism and modern methods. One of those problems is that it tends to present the Story in a way that leaves out a lot of the background and depth. We should not console ourselves with some cliché about “needing to get them lost before we can get them saved.” God created a world reconciled to Himself, the fall destroyed this, but He still wants the world to be reconciled to Him, so He sent His son. Not just so we don’t go to Hell, but so that a relationship is restored, and there is a return to living the way we were created.
Why does the “Romans Road” telling of the story, so often begin with establishing sin as the problem? It is a problem, but the difficulty is not that those facts are untrue. They are true. Justification is true. It is a wonderful blessing that should be celebrated. We are declared righteous, just as if we had never sinned. But, in light of the Story’s essence, Justification is a by product in the story of God’s Reconciliation of all creation.
And, I did go to the store yesterday to buy four new tires. It is just not what the story is about.
What would my life be like if I could balance our emphasis on Justification with an emphasis on Reconciliation? What is it like to read the Bible with a construct that emphasizes what the Story is really about? What do the teachings of Jesus mean when I read them with an emphasis on the essence of the Story, and not the Justification model?
So when we tell the Story to others…
Start with Creation, In the Beginning, instead of staring with the Fall.
Instead of just emphasizing Justification and the benefits of the future, let’s emphasize Reconciliation and the implications of right now.
God is in the business of reconciling the world to Himself.
I can’t take credit for the story and the discussion that follows, both belong to someone else, I do feel though it at least makes an attempt to “tell the story in its entirety”…what do you think?